The Kaiser’s Holocaust: Germany’s Forgotten Genocide and the Colonial Roots of Nazism

Chapter 1: The World Behind the Fog

The chapter begins by zooming in on a key historical moment: the departure of two caravels from Lisbon in the late summer of 1484, led by Portuguese navigator Diogo Cão. Their mission, under King João II, was to find a sea route to India—an effort emblematic of the 15th-century European obsession with reaching the riches of the East. As Portugal abandoned hopes of an Atlantic crossing (as proposed by Columbus), the focus shifted decisively to Africa.

Despite centuries of African-European contact during Greco-Roman times, Islamic dominance in North Africa after the 5th century had effectively severed Africa from European knowledge and commerce. By the 15th century, sub-Saharan Africa was a mystery—a place of myth and fear in the European imagination. Europeans speculated about monstrous inhabitants and deadly heat, while still fantasizing about its potential wealth and connection to Asia.

As Diogo Cão’s ships traveled southward along the African coastline, they passed vibrant, populous regions with flourishing trade and large kingdoms, especially around the Niger and Congo Rivers. But as they approached what is now southern Angola and Namibia, the verdant coastline gave way to a more barren, unsettling landscape. Here they encountered the Namib Desert—harsh, foggy, and wind-lashed—a land that discouraged colonization and seemed almost supernatural in its desolation.

This landscape, known to the indigenous Khoi peoples as “Namib,” meaning “the place where there is nothing,” played a dual role. It discouraged European conquest and thereby shielded its inhabitants. Yet it also fostered a European belief in the region’s emptiness and mystery, setting the stage for future violent colonization.

Despite the environment’s austerity, the region was far from uninhabited. Its earliest known residents, the San people, had occupied the land for tens of thousands of years, leaving behind a legacy of intricate rock art that is among the most important and oldest artistic traditions in human history. Their semi-nomadic lifestyle was closely adapted to the arid landscape.

Later came the Owambo and Herero peoples—Bantu-speaking migrants from the north who brought with them cattle herding, matrilineal kinship systems, and deeply rooted spiritual practices centered around ancestor veneration and sacred fire. The Herero in particular developed a pastoral economy based on extensive knowledge of the desert’s scarce water resources, thriving in a clan-based system without centralized kingship.

The Nama, another Khoi-speaking group, also settled the region. They were highly mobile, socially flexible, and known for their resistance to outside domination.

By the 19th century, colonial encounters began to shape this world. African societies began to engage with new forms of trade, especially in cattle and firearms. The authors describe a landscape dotted with small multicultural encampments—Herero, Nama, San, white traders, and missionaries—gathered around nightly fires in the cold desert. This complex frontier society, they argue, was not passive or untouched but actively engaged in commerce, political negotiations, and conflict.

Guns and brandy became new currencies. Alcoholism and indebtedness followed, bringing a colonial legacy of social destabilization even before formal colonization began. Europeans, especially marginal figures like conmen and failed prospectors, bartered at exorbitant rates and introduced a new kind of parasitic capitalism.

The chapter compares this region to the American Wild West. Like North America, it was a frontier—lawless, violent, and capitalist. But in this African “Wild West,” the roles of “cowboys and Indians” were blurred: Africans were both the defenders of land and the dominant pastoralists. They adapted quickly to the tools and strategies of the white traders, often mastering firearms and mobility better than their European counterparts.

Despite this dynamism, South-West Africa remained uncolonized by European empires. The interior was still largely untouched, with no railways or ports. From Europe’s perspective, it was a blank spot on the map—a terra incognita filled with danger, wealth, and racial fantasies.

As the chapter ends, it hints at the approaching catastrophe: a shift from a semi-symbiotic frontier to a genocidal colonial regime under German imperial control. The fog—literal and symbolic—that once kept European domination at bay was about to lift.

Key Takeaways

  1. Pre-colonial Namibia was far from “empty”: It had a rich history of San, Herero, Nama, and Owambo cultures, each deeply adapted to the harsh environment.
  2. The Namib Desert served as a natural and cultural “shield”: It delayed European conquest and protected indigenous lifeways for centuries.
  3. Trade and Capitalism existed long before colonization: African groups were full participants in frontier capitalism, often outmaneuvering white traders.
  4. The frontier resembled the American West: Violent, capitalist, and filled with myth, it saw Africans occupying dual roles as both natives and settlers.
  5. Colonial destabilization preceded formal rule: Alcohol, guns, and debt began eroding traditional self-sufficiency even before the arrival of German imperialism.
  6. German colonization would transform this frontier: The stage was set for exterminationist policies and ideological blueprints that prefigured Nazi racial war.

Chapter 2: The Iron Chancellor and the Guano King

Chapter 2 explores the political and economic motives behind Germany’s late entry into the imperial scramble for Africa. It focuses on two key figures: Otto von Bismarck, the so-called “Iron Chancellor” and mastermind of German unification, and Adolph Lüderitz, a shady businessman whose ventures in Africa laid the foundations for Germany’s genocidal colonial empire in South-West Africa.

Bismarck and the Reluctant Empire

Although Bismarck unified Germany in 1871, he remained ambivalent toward overseas imperial expansion for most of his career. He saw colonies as economically burdensome and geopolitically risky, preferring to focus on European power balances. This sets him apart from his British and French counterparts, who were already investing heavily in overseas conquests.

However, by the early 1880s, Bismarck began to shift under pressure from commercial lobbyists, naval officers, and political rivals. Germany’s industrialization created a new class of entrepreneurs and traders eager for markets and raw materials. The new Reich, still seeking international legitimacy and prestige, was also drawn into the competitive atmosphere of the “Scramble for Africa.”

This political pressure merged with a wave of public enthusiasm for imperialism. The German public, influenced by jingoistic press and explorers’ tales, developed a fantasy of Africa as a blank canvas for civilizational uplift—and for racial conquest.

The Guano King: Lüderitz’s Scam

At the center of this transformation stood Adolph Lüderitz, a tobacco merchant from Bremen whose speculative ventures in South-West Africa are portrayed as a mixture of deceit, delusion, and opportunism.

In 1883, Lüderitz acquired a piece of barren coastal land from Nama chiefs under highly questionable circumstances. He named it “Angra Pequena,” later Lüderitzbucht, and claimed extensive hinterlands by manipulating local understandings of land and legal contracts. The Nama had no concept of permanent land alienation, and no reason to believe they were giving away sovereignty.

Lüderitz’s primary goal was not empire-building but speculation. He imagined that the land would yield guano, the prized fertilizer of the 19th century, and possibly other mineral wealth. The German government initially refused to support his venture. But when he falsely portrayed British interest in the area as imminent, Bismarck acted to pre-empt British annexation—motivated less by strategic ambition than by embarrassment at being seen as a weak imperial player.

From Private Fraud to Public Empire

By 1884, Bismarck issued a formal declaration of German protection over Lüderitz’s acquisitions. This marked the creation of German South-West Africa—the empire’s first African colony. In doing so, a private swindle was transformed into state policy.

Bismarck, though cynical and disinterested in the actual value of the territory, used this move to gain leverage at the Berlin Conference (1884–85), which carved Africa into European spheres of influence. His approach was transactional: colonies as bargaining chips, rather than long-term assets.

Meanwhile, Lüderitz died in mysterious circumstances—presumably drowning while exploring the coast. But his dubious legacy endured. The arbitrary borders, illegitimate land purchases, and shallow understanding of local politics set the stage for future conflict.

The Myth of “Civilizing Mission”

Despite the chaotic and corrupt origins of the colony, German officials and settlers propagated the idea of a civilizing mission. Lüderitz was posthumously hailed as a martyr for empire. His actions—though economically irrational and morally bankrupt—were repackaged as heroic. The narrative of benevolent imperialism masked the deeply exploitative and fraudulent nature of early German colonialism.

The authors emphasize how this myth-making was essential. It justified the transition from informal trade and contact to militarized domination and, eventually, genocide. The gap between rhetoric and reality would only grow as more settlers arrived and clashed with indigenous populations.

Key Takeaways

  1. Bismarck was a reluctant imperialist: Initially opposed to colonies, he was drawn into the African race by political pressure and opportunism, not ideology.
  2. Lüderitz’s acquisition was based on fraud: He manipulated land purchases with the Nama using legal concepts they did not understand, laying colonial foundations on deceit.
  3. German South-West Africa began as a speculative gamble: The colony was born not out of strategic planning but economic desperation and personal ambition.
  4. The Berlin Conference formalized illegitimate claims: Bismarck used Lüderitz’s fake empire as a bargaining chip during European negotiations over Africa.
  5. Colonial myth-making obscured violent origins: Lüderitz was posthumously glorified to justify expansion, despite having swindled African leaders and left no real development.
  6. Fraud turned into genocide: The flimsy, violent, and exploitative foundations of German colonialism set the trajectory toward exterminationist policy in the decades to come.

Chapter 3: This Is My Land

This chapter delves into the psychology and practice of German settler colonialism in South-West Africa following the establishment of formal imperial rule. It charts how early German settlers, once on African soil, transformed from impoverished migrants and misfits into men who claimed land, status, and power, redefining their personal and national identities through the act of dispossession.

From Imperial Charter to Settler Domination

Following the official declaration of German protection in 1884, Germany sent administrators, soldiers, and traders to its new colony. But the most impactful group were the settlers—farmers, artisans, and adventurers, many of whom were failures in the homeland. For them, Africa was a blank slate where they could reinvent themselves. They quickly appropriated land, disregarding indigenous claims and communal ownership systems.

The German settlers viewed land not as a collective heritage, as Herero and Nama societies did, but as a commodity, one that could be owned, bought, and sold. This legal and cultural divergence underpinned the violence that would soon erupt.

Land in the colony was often distributed or seized through informal deals, often involving deception, alcohol, or brute coercion. One technique settlers used was to place markers or “notices” claiming territory—a practice rooted in European law but entirely alien to African systems of land use, which were communal and spiritual.

“This Is My Land” – The Colonial Mindset

The title phrase of the chapter captures the psychological shift settlers underwent. Owning land in Africa became a symbol of whiteness, masculinity, and national renewal. Many of these settlers had no land or status in Germany, but in Africa, by virtue of their skin color and their access to the colonial state’s support, they acquired both.

The idea that Germany could forge a stronger national character by settling its citizens in “wild” lands was pervasive in colonial propaganda. These lands were framed as underutilized or “empty,” despite the obvious presence of African communities with long-standing ties to the terrain. This concept—terra nullius—was not only a legal fiction but a genocidal ideology.

Clashing Worldviews and Rising Tensions

For the Herero, land was sacred and communal, tied to ancestors and history. The German settlers, who marked out ranches with fences and signs, interpreted African resistance or skepticism as insolence. Clashes over land ownership were not just legal disputes—they were cultural confrontations between incompatible worldviews.

As more settlers arrived, disputes increased. Settlers complained of Africans crossing their lands, ignoring property boundaries, or continuing to use traditional water points. African life rhythms—transhumance, cattle grazing, shared wells—were now criminalized or violently punished.

Herero and Nama leaders attempted to negotiate or resist diplomatically, but were often met with arrogance or force. The Germans dismissed indigenous authorities as illegitimate and uncivilized, deepening the resentment.

Land and Race

Race became increasingly tied to land ownership. The Germans saw the ability to “improve” land as a function of racial superiority. African land use—especially the open, mobile pastoralism of the Herero—was seen as primitive and wasteful. Settlers argued that only whites could make the land productive and thus deserved to possess it.

This narrative, grounded in racial capitalism, justified escalating acts of dispossession. The indigenous population was pushed into increasingly marginal and unviable lands, with little regard for their livelihoods or survival.

The authors stress that this process was not a bureaucratic abstraction. It was intimate, often violent, and personal. Settlers threatened, beat, or killed those who resisted, and increasingly called on military force to back their claims. The line between settler and soldier began to blur.

Toward a Settler Colony

By the late 1890s, German South-West Africa was not just a colony—it was becoming a settler society in which white landownership was paramount and African existence increasingly criminalized.

The settler economy relied on theft, coercion, and the deliberate erosion of traditional lifeways. What began with disputed treaties and forged land deeds soon evolved into a system that would require war—and ultimately genocide—to complete.

Key Takeaways

  1. Land theft was the foundation of German colonialism: Settlers seized land through fraud, violence, and culturally incomprehensible legal instruments.
  2. Different worldviews collided: Germans saw land as private property; Africans saw it as communal, ancestral, and sacred.
  3. Settlers redefined themselves through conquest: Many came from humble backgrounds, but in Africa they became “masters” through racial privilege and state support.
  4. Racism justified dispossession: Africans were deemed incapable of properly using land, providing a moral pretext for theft and domination.
  5. Conflict became inevitable: The expansion of settler claims and erosion of indigenous systems set the stage for armed resistance and genocidal repression.
  6. Colonialism was personal and intimate: Settlers themselves carried out much of the early violence, shaping a brutal settler society long before formal wars began.

Chapter 4: Soldier of Darkness

From The Kaiser’s Holocaust by David Olusoga & Casper W. Erichsen


In June 1889, twenty-one German “explorers” arrived at the British port of Walvis Bay. Their official mission was scientific, but their armaments and discipline betrayed another purpose: they were soldiers, led by Captain Curt von François, a Prussian officer with a brutal colonial résumé. Von François had previously served King Leopold II in the Congo—a private colony infamous for terror, slavery, and brutality. There, he learned to subjugate Africans through violence, whips, and rifles. He brought these methods to South-West Africa.


Colonial Shock and Strategy

Upon arrival, von François was frustrated. The colony was still largely uncolonized. Africans owned property, bore arms, and did not treat Germans with expected deference. To von François, this was a disgrace to imperial honor. He immediately resolved to impose German rule not by negotiation, but by overwhelming force.

Von François’s military base was established at Windhoek, which he occupied by force, driving out the local Nama population and destroying their structures. From there, he began his campaign to crush indigenous resistance, focusing on the Witbooi Nama, led by Hendrik Witbooi, one of the most capable and charismatic African leaders.


Hoornkrans Massacre

Von François’s most infamous act came in April 1893, when his troops launched a surprise attack on Witbooi’s encampment at Hoornkrans. Under the cover of darkness, his forces slaughtered 78 women and children, as well as a few elderly men and boys. Eyewitness accounts from soldiers describe horrific scenes: children executed at close range, homes torched with inhabitants inside, corpses of women strewn across the valley.

While some German troops were disturbed by the scale of the violence, von François portrayed the massacre as a legitimate military victory. He and his men looted the camp, taking everything from rifles and livestock to domestic items like coffee grinders and violins. They also enslaved 80 Witbooi women, including Witbooi’s daughter, who warned her captors that her father would soon return to avenge them.


The Birth of a Genocidal Doctrine

This attack was not an anomaly—it marked the beginning of a new doctrine. Von François believed Africans understood only force and needed to be broken to recognize white authority. His actions foreshadowed the policy of extermination that would follow in the coming decade under General von Trotha.

He saw his task not merely as conquest but as racial domination—to replace African sovereignty with German racial and territorial hegemony. His worldview was shaped by years in the Congo and embodied the worst aspects of European colonial ideology: a lethal mix of racial superiority, military adventurism, and imperial entitlement.


A Legacy of Violence

The chapter closes by showing how von François’s methods became a template for future German colonialism. His blend of military aggression, racist ideology, and disdain for African lives informed German policy well into the Herero and Nama genocide.

He claimed victory at Hoornkrans would end African resistance, but instead it provoked a cycle of rebellion, reprisals, and escalation. African leaders like Hendrik Witbooi did not surrender—they reorganized and fought back, sowing the seeds of prolonged and bloody conflict.


Key Takeaways

  1. Curt von François imported brutality from the Congo: Having served King Leopold II, he used similar violent tactics in South-West Africa.
  2. The Hoornkrans massacre was a turning point: It marked a shift toward genocidal warfare and targeted civilians.
  3. Von François operated under a racial ideology: He viewed Africans as inferiors to be dominated, not negotiated with.
  4. German troops looted and enslaved survivors: The violence was followed by the theft of goods and human captives, showing the colonial logic of conquest.
  5. Massacres were reframed as military victories: Even atrocities were legitimized through the language of imperial success.
  6. These early atrocities laid the groundwork for genocide: Von François’s actions were not aberrations, but the beginning of a systematic campaign of racial extermination.

Chapter 5: European Nations Do Not Make War in That Way

From The Kaiser’s Holocaust by David Olusoga & Casper W. Erichsen


This chapter explores the Hoornkrans massacre as a pivotal event in the transformation of German colonial warfare into genocidal violence. It situates the attack within the wider global pattern of colonial “small wars,” debunking the notion that European warfare abroad adhered to any form of moral or ethical restraint.


The Fiction of European “Civilized War”

In 1893, Hendrik Witbooi wrote to John Cleverly, the British magistrate in Walvis Bay, pleading for international attention to the slaughter of women and children by German troops at Hoornkrans. His letter highlighted the contradiction between Germany’s image as a “mighty and civilised people” and its ruthless actions in the colony.

Cleverly’s response—”European nations do not make war in that way”—was hypocritical. He knew well that European colonial forces across the globe had waged war precisely “in that way”: through massacres, scorched earth policies, and mass civilian killings. The German press had initially framed Hoornkrans as a legitimate military victory, but reports in the British press painted it clearly as a massacre of innocents, drawing international scrutiny.


Colonial War as Genocidal War

The chapter argues that colonial warfare rarely consisted of set-piece battles between trained armies. Instead, violence in the colonies was typically perpetrated through punitive expeditions, massacres, and ambushes that deliberately targeted civilians. These tactics mirrored what had happened at Hoornkrans—and were not the exception, but the norm.

Examples are drawn from around the world: from Tasmania and the American plains to Africa and Asia. European colonizers, armed with superior weapons and a sense of racial destiny, believed themselves morally and biologically justified in eliminating indigenous resistance—no matter how brutal the methods.


Forgotten Atrocities and the Myth of Progress

The authors underscore how these “small wars” were hidden from European public consciousness. Unlike grand colonial battles like Isandlwana or Omdurman, the real machinery of empire-building—massacres, famines, displacement—was rarely memorialized or examined.

Even today, these events remain obscure. Those few massacres that are remembered often involved the deaths of Europeans or the acquisition of exotic spoils. But the majority—like Hoornkrans—were quietly buried beneath national myths of benevolent imperialism.


Colonialism as Prelude to Genocide

One of the most striking arguments in the chapter is the continuity between colonial violence and the genocides of the 20th century. In the 19th century, it became common to argue that the laws of war did not apply to “savages.” Social Darwinism further reinforced the idea that inferior races would naturally perish in the face of European superiority.

This ideological framework directly informed the Nazi extermination campaigns of the 20th century. The chapter foreshadows how the methods honed in Africa would later be turned against Europeans themselves, particularly in the East under Hitler.


Key Takeaways

  1. Witbooi appealed to Europe’s conscience, but in vain: His account of the Hoornkrans massacre revealed Germany’s brutal methods, yet elicited only hypocrisy and denial.
  2. Colonial warfare was inherently genocidal: Small-scale wars targeted civilians and were designed to break entire societies, not just armies.
  3. Europe justified brutality with race and “civilization”: Indigenous resistance was framed as illegitimate, enabling atrocities to be committed with impunity.
  4. Massacres like Hoornkrans were standard practice: Empire was not built by fair fights but through ambushes, starvation, and terror.
  5. The myth of noble empire obscures atrocities: European publics were shielded from the realities of colonial conquest, allowing historical amnesia to set in.
  6. Colonial violence laid the groundwork for the Holocaust: Concepts like racial hierarchy, annihilation warfare, and moral exemption for superior races crossed over into European war zones in the 20th century.

Chapter 6: A Piece of Natural Savagery

This chapter examines how imperial Germany attempted to legitimize and popularize its colonial empire through spectacle and science, culminating in the 1896 Berlin Colonial Exhibition. It exposes how Africans were turned into anthropological specimens and imperial trophies—displaced, studied, and displayed for public amusement and scientific validation.

Colonialism and the Rise of Human Zoos

In the late 19th century, European metropolises, including Berlin, became fascinated with racial exhibitions. African and Asian people were transported and exhibited in Völkerschauen—“people shows”—often in zoos or public fairgrounds, alongside exotic animals. These events blurred the line between entertainment and pseudo-science. Anthropologists measured skulls, catalogued “racial traits”, and proclaimed the primitiveness of the subjects on display.

These exhibitions catered to a white European audience that rarely saw non-Europeans. In an era when European cities were racially homogenous, the presence of live “specimens” generated awe and reaffirmed racial hierarchies.

The 1896 Berlin Colonial Exhibition

The most infamous of these shows occurred in Treptow Park, Berlin, under the patronage of the Kaiser himself. Over 100 individuals from Germany’s African and Pacific colonies were brought to Berlin and displayed in reconstructed “native villages.” These enclosures reproduced tribal life as imagined by German anthropologists, offering Berliners what organizers called a “piece of natural savagery” in the heart of the empire.

The event fused colonial propaganda with scientific racism. These human beings were simultaneously subjects of spectacle and objects of study. German ethnographers took this opportunity to measure, classify, and photograph them, hoping to validate theories of racial difference. The subjects, including prominent figures such as Friedrich Maharero, were often humiliated and exoticized.

Colonial Anxiety and National Identity

The Berlin show was not only about public entertainment; it reflected a broader imperial anxiety. Germany’s colonial project lagged behind Britain and France. The spectacle of the exhibition helped manufacture a sense of imperial pride and national belonging.

This chapter links these exhibitions to Germany’s larger self-image crisis. Industrialization and urbanization had destabilized traditional society. For many Germans, colonialism offered a fantasy of renewal, racial superiority, and historical destiny. The colonial show helped transform Germany’s imperial subjects into symbolic affirmations of its national greatness.

The Scientific Turn to Racial Hierarchy

By the late 19th century, Darwinian theory—distorted into Social Darwinism—combined with eugenic thinking to reinforce genocidal ideologies. Indigenous people were increasingly viewed not as potential converts or allies, but as biologically inferior and destined for extinction.

As such, German colonialism became more openly eliminationist. Africans were not merely dominated; they were studied as relics of a dying race. These same ideas would later shape Nazi ideology. The obsession with racial hierarchy, scientific justification for violence, and the state’s use of pseudo-anthropology to define “life unworthy of life” all had their precursors in the colonial period.

Key Takeaways

  1. Germany used racial exhibitions to promote its empire: The Berlin Colonial Show in 1896 showcased indigenous people as spectacles and specimens.
  2. Völkerschauen blurred science and entertainment: Human beings were measured, categorized, and displayed in pseudo-scientific displays of racial difference.
  3. Colonial propaganda masked insecurity: The exhibition helped paper over Germany’s relatively weak colonial presence and fostered national pride.
  4. Scientific racism reached new extremes: Social Darwinism and anthropology merged to justify domination and foreshadow racial extermination.
  5. Colonial ideology shaped future genocides: The logic of racial categorization and elimination seen in the colonies re-emerged in Nazi racial policy.

Chapter 7: King of the Huns

This chapter introduces one of the central figures in the genocide of the Herero people: General Lothar von Trotha. It charts his arrival in German South-West Africa, his worldview shaped by military service in other colonial wars, and the role he played in transitioning German imperialism from violent conquest to full-scale extermination policy.

The Rise of a Genocidal Commander

Von Trotha was a career officer from the Prussian military elite, forged in wars of German unification and colonial pacification. He had previously served in German East Africa and notably in the Boxer Rebellion in China—an event that deeply influenced his racial and strategic worldview.

He believed that indigenous uprisings had to be crushed swiftly, ruthlessly, and totally. He saw negotiation or diplomacy as weakness and preferred overwhelming, symbolic violence designed to terrify opponents into submission.

The Herero Revolt and Berlin’s Response

In early 1904, the Herero, led by Samuel Maharero, launched a revolt against German settlers and soldiers. Years of land theft, forced labor, and violent abuse had pushed them to the edge. The uprising shocked Berlin, especially given the growing number of German civilians living in the colony.

In response, Germany dispatched von Trotha and thousands of reinforcements, determined not merely to defeat the Herero militarily, but to annihilate them as a people. Von Trotha brought not only military experience, but a blueprint for genocidal warfare.

Race War in the Desert

Von Trotha envisioned war in racial terms. In his own words, he declared:

“I believe that the nation as such must be annihilated.”

His aim was to destroy the Herero entirely—by military means, starvation, thirst, and denial of access to water sources. He pursued them across the Omaheke desert, sealing off wells and driving them into the interior. Thousands died of thirst and exhaustion.

He issued the now-infamous “Extermination Order” (Vernichtungsbefehl) in October 1904, stating that every Herero found within German territory, armed or unarmed, would be shot. Women and children were included in this genocidal decree. It was, in effect, a public declaration of racial extermination.

“Huns” and the Myth of German Exceptionalism

The chapter’s title refers to Kaiser Wilhelm II’s infamous “Hun speech” during the Boxer Rebellion, in which he urged German soldiers to behave like Attila the Hun—“no quarter given, no prisoners taken.”

This language, and its later adoption by British propaganda during WWI to characterize Germans as “Huns,” is used here to highlight the ideological roots of German colonial warfare: a racialized, apocalyptic worldview that fused conquest with annihilation.

Von Trotha was the perfect vessel for this ideology. He saw the war not as a temporary crisis but as an opportunity to remake the colony as a white settler space, purified of African resistance or presence.

Berlin’s Nervousness and Attempted Moderation

While von Trotha was executing genocidal policies on the ground, politicians in Berlin began to worry about international backlash and the cost of total war. There was also fear that exterminating the entire Herero population would deprive the colony of cheap labor.

As a result, the extermination order was eventually rescinded. But by then, thousands had already perished. Survivors were forced into concentration camps, where death continued through disease, overwork, and abuse. The ideological goal of destruction had already been largely accomplished.

Key Takeaways

  1. Von Trotha was a product of German colonial militarism: His experience in East Africa and China shaped his ruthless racial ideology.
  2. The Herero revolt prompted genocidal escalation: What began as rebellion was met with plans for total ethnic annihilation.
  3. The extermination order marked a turning point: Germany became the first modern state to declare and carry out genocide in the 20th century.
  4. The “Hun” identity was internalized and weaponized: Far from being a foreign slur, it reflected real imperial doctrine and rhetoric.
  5. Berlin’s intervention was pragmatic, not moral: The rescinding of the extermination order was driven by economic and diplomatic concerns, not ethical ones.
  6. The foundations of Nazi ideology were laid in the colonies: Concepts of racial war, Lebensraum, and extermination took root in Africa decades before the Holocaust.

Chapter 8: Rivers of Blood and Money

This chapter examines the close relationship between colonial genocide and economic exploitation in German South-West Africa. It focuses on how settler capitalism, military policy, and state-backed violence worked hand in hand to dispossess, exploit, and destroy the Herero and Nama peoples.

Okahandja: A Divided Town

By 1904, the town of Okahandja symbolized the dual reality of colonial Namibia. The European quarter was a hub of German settler infrastructure: railways, farms, garrisons. It was the logistical center of a growing settler economy.

Just a few miles away, the Herero quarter remained a vibrant indigenous town, full of life, ritual, and commerce. It was also the spiritual heartland of the Herero people, housing the holy fire of the Maharero clan and the graves of ancestors. Samuel Maharero, the paramount chief, presided over this community with prestige and growing unease. Tensions with settlers had reached a boiling point.

The Spark of Rebellion

On January 12, 1904, Herero fighters launched a surprise uprising across the region. Their primary targets were German military outposts and settler infrastructure, not civilians. Contrary to German propaganda, the Herero did not engage in mass civilian slaughter; several alleged massacres were fabricated to justify German reprisal.

Missionary sources later confirmed that most white women and children had been spared. But the myth of Herero barbarity took hold in the German press, prompting Berlin to authorize a brutal counter-campaign.

Genocide as a Military-Economic Strategy

The military suppression of the Herero rebellion was inseparable from the economic ambitions of the settler class. The Herero owned tens of thousands of cattle and vast tracts of fertile land. These resources were now seen as up for grabs.

General von Trotha’s scorched earth campaign and extermination order were not only genocidal—they also served to dismantle the Herero economic base. Survivors were driven into the desert, and their livestock was seized. Their land was redistributed to white settlers or held by the state for speculative resale.

A survivor, Katherine Zeraua, described how women and children perished by the thousands in the desert. Those without cattle tried to dig water holes with their bare hands. People were buried alive as the walls of improvised wells collapsed. The landscape became a graveyard.

Profiting from Death

The Herero genocide became a wealth transfer event. German settlers, the colonial administration, and German investors profited immensely from the catastrophe. Some settler families became fabulously wealthy by acquiring land and cattle at virtually no cost.

The authors describe this process as the fusion of racial extermination and capitalist expansion. The Herero and Nama were simultaneously destroyed and expropriated. It was a model of profit through annihilation—an ideology of “clearing the land” by clearing the people.

Official Justifications

Even as evidence of atrocities mounted, German officials justified their actions by claiming the Herero had started a “race war” and needed to be taught a lesson. The battle of the Waterberg and the forced march into the Omaheke desert were reframed as strategic brilliance.

A German military history of the campaign even boasted that the desert itself had completed the extermination in ways no army ever could.

Key Takeaways

  1. Okahandja embodied colonial apartheid: A town divided between settler wealth and indigenous heritage, poised for conflict.
  2. The Herero revolt was misrepresented: Most alleged atrocities were fabrications used to justify genocidal retaliation.
  3. Genocide served economic interests: The Herero were exterminated not just for control, but to seize land, cattle, and labor.
  4. The desert became a killing field: Survivors were driven into the Omaheke, where thirst and starvation did what bullets could not.
  5. Settlers profited from genocide: Land and livestock were redistributed to white colonists, enriching many and entrenching settler capitalism.
  6. The logic of racial capitalism was central: Violence was not an aberration but a tool of economic restructuring—colonialism by extermination.

Chapter 9: Death Through Exhaustion

After General von Trotha’s genocidal campaign in the Omaheke desert forced tens of thousands of Herero to flee, starve, and die of thirst, a new phase of extermination emerged—not on the battlefield, but within concentration camps. Survivors who surrendered or were captured were moved into a network of camps where they were subjected to systematic death through starvation, exposure, disease, and brutal forced labor.

Arrival in the Camps

The camps established across Swakopmund, Windhoek, Okahandja, and most notoriously, Shark Island, were anything but humanitarian. They were punitive spaces where survivors, already weakened from the desert ordeal, were further degraded.

In Swakopmund, prisoners were initially housed in open-air enclosures with no protection from sun or wind. Their first task was to build the very camps in which they would be imprisoned. German officers boasted that the labor was intended to “toughen them” or “weed out the weak”.

“Death Through Exhaustion”: A Bureaucratic Mask for Genocide

The term “death through exhaustion” (German: Tod durch Erschöpfung) became a chillingly normalized phrase. In the Totenregister (death registers) found in Namibian archives, the cause of death was often pre-printed as “exhaustion, bronchitis, heart disease or scurvy”. In truth, these were deaths caused by deliberate neglect.

Witnesses reported people dying in their sleep, while working, or standing in line for food. One missionary, Wilhelm Eich, noted that only those with strong physiques were selected for labor. Others were left to wither and die.

Conditions in the Camps

In Swakopmund, over 1,100 prisoners were confined by early 1905. By May, 399 were dead—111 of those in just the final two weeks of the month. Starvation was rampant. Rations were insufficient and nutritionally bankrupt. Disease spread quickly in unsanitary conditions where bodies were rarely buried properly, and flies and vermin infested the camps.

Missionary reports described women and children dying alongside corpses, their skin shriveling from thirst, their limbs wasted from malnutrition. Some victims resorted to eating rats or digging for roots. Others were subjected to medical experimentation, as on Shark Island, where prisoners were tested with unproven treatments or used for anatomical studies after death.

Forced Labor and Eugenic Ideology

Forced labor was not just economic—it was ideological. Governor Tecklenburg explicitly argued that the goal was to break the Herero, ensuring that only the “strongest and most obedient” survived. These survivors would be used as a servile labor caste in the future German colony.

He justified the mass deaths as unfortunate but necessary:

“The more the Herero feel the consequences of the uprising on their own bodies, the less future generations will feel inclined to rebel… Those that survive will have learned their inferiority”.

This vision reflected a proto-eugenic rationale. The camps functioned as selective mechanisms of racial engineering—those deemed physically or politically unfit were allowed to perish.

The Machinery of Annihilation

German officials not only allowed this extermination system to flourish, they institutionalized it. Administrative documents—lists, reports, medical notes, and orders—reveal a bureaucratic machinery of death. Everything from food rations to work schedules to death counts was recorded and managed with cold precision.

The process of destruction was thus sanitized, hidden behind a veil of military necessity and administrative language. There were no crematoria, but death came just as surely—by slow attrition and structural abandonment.

Legacy and Continuity

The concentration camp system in South-West Africa marked the first modern attempt to bureaucratize genocide. The term “concentration camp” itself would later return with darker meanings in Nazi Germany, and many of the men involved in the Namibian camps, or their protégés, would later serve under the Third Reich.

The Herero genocide and its camps were, as the authors argue, not merely colonial excesses—they were blueprints for later totalitarian strategies of racial destruction.

Key Takeaways

  1. German concentration camps in Namibia were genocidal by design, not accident or mismanagement.
  2. “Death through exhaustion” became a euphemism that concealed starvation, neglect, and overwork behind administrative language.
  3. Forced labor was ideological as well as economic, a system meant to crush Herero identity and filter survivors into a submissive underclass.
  4. Bureaucracy enabled genocide: forms, logs, and pre-printed death causes show a chilling normalization of mass death.
  5. Survivors were few and traumatized: testimony from missionaries and victims documents physical ruin and spiritual annihilation.
  6. The Namibian camps prefigured 20th-century genocides: their structures and logic reappeared in Nazi death camps and totalitarian systems.

Chapter 10: Peace Will Spell Death for Me and My Nation

This chapter shifts focus to the Nama resistance—specifically the role of Hendrik Witbooi, one of the most remarkable African leaders of the colonial period. It chronicles how the Nama, long allied with the Germans under treaty, turned against them after witnessing the full scale of the Herero genocide. The chapter’s title comes from a powerful letter written by Witbooi in 1905, signaling his refusal to surrender despite overwhelming odds.

From Ally to Rebel

In 1894, Hendrik Witbooi signed a protection treaty with the Germans, aligning the Witbooi Nama with colonial authorities. For years, his warriors served as auxiliaries in German campaigns. In 1904, they were even deployed alongside General von Trotha’s forces during the Herero uprising.

But the Battle of Waterberg changed everything. Witbooi’s soldiers watched as German troops machine-gunned fleeing Herero women and children. They were ordered to execute Herero captives and realized that Germany’s aim was not military victory, but total annihilation.

Rattled and betrayed, Witbooi’s men abandoned their posts and rode south, covering nearly 200 miles to warn their leader. When they reached Witbooi in Rietmont, they were grim and silent. During a tense council meeting with elders and missionaries, Witbooi weighed their testimony. Despite German protestations, he concluded:

“Who can I believe if not my own people?”

The Decision to Fight

From 1904 onward, German settlers in the southern Nama lands openly advocated for disarming the Nama tribes. Tensions grew, and Witbooi—already wary of his alliance—came under pressure from younger warriors who had witnessed the horrors in the north. His own son, Isaak Witbooi, was among the most vocal opponents of surrender.

By 1905, the Nama found themselves in crisis. Trapped in Tsoachaib, a remote riverbed near Gibeon, with limited food and freezing conditions, morale was breaking. Witbooi’s trusted lieutenant, Samuel Izaak, fell gravely ill and begged for peace talks. A letter from the German authorities urging surrender arrived soon after.

Witbooi’s reply was unambiguous:

“Peace will spell death for me and my nation, for I know that there is no place for me in your midst… In your peace I can see nothing but a desire to destroy us to the last men.”

Witbooi’s Final Days

In October 1905, Hendrik Witbooi was mortally wounded during a raid near Fahlgras. He was hit in the thigh by shrapnel and fled, bleeding heavily. His fighters carried him for three days toward British territory, hoping to save him. But he died en route, near Khoes, just 30 miles from safety.

His last words were:

“It is enough now. The children shall have peace.”

Fearing desecration, his men buried him in an unmarked grave and trampled it with cattle to conceal it.

Aftermath and Legacy

Witbooi’s death dealt a devastating blow to the Nama alliance, which began to fracture soon after. However, his resistance—grounded in moral clarity and personal sacrifice—elevated him to a near-mythical status in Namibian history.

The Germans, meanwhile, saw his death as a strategic victory. Von Trotha, shortly before being relieved of command, reportedly told the messenger who brought the news:

“This is the best news you could have brought me.”

Witbooi’s struggle was not just military—it was a philosophical rejection of colonial deceit, racial supremacy, and the betrayal of trust. His letters, dictated and preserved, are rare firsthand records of African resistance in the age of empire.

Key Takeaways

  1. Hendrik Witbooi was a reluctant ally turned resolute opponent, radicalized by witnessing genocide.
  2. The Herero genocide triggered Nama resistance, as German brutality made it clear no native group would be spared.
  3. Witbooi’s letter rejecting German peace offers is a pivotal document of anti-colonial defiance.
  4. The Nama suffered under worsening conditions, but internal divisions complicated the decision to surrender.
  5. Witbooi died in flight, close to safety, his final words calling for peace for future generations.
  6. His legacy endures as a foundational figure in Namibian history—both as a warrior and a political thinker.

Chapter 11: You Yourselves Carry the Blame for Your Misery

This chapter focuses on the transition from military conquest to colonial statecraft under the administration of Friedrich von Lindequist, who succeeded von Trotha as governor of German South-West Africa in late 1905. It examines how von Lindequist deployed a language of moral blame, rhetorical reconciliation, and bureaucratic manipulation to consolidate Germany’s genocidal gains, and it explores how the colonial system turned survivors into laboring captives while publicly displacing responsibility for their suffering.

Arrival of Von Lindequist: From War to “Peace”

Von Lindequist’s arrival on 22 November 1905 marked a shift from overt military annihilation to administrative control and rhetorical justification. Upon his arrival in Swakopmund, he quickly visited the Herero concentration camps, where around 800 prisoners—mostly women—were assembled for a ceremonial speech. Missionary Vedder attempted to clean them up and disguise their condition, but malnutrition and trauma were still visible.

Standing before them, Lindequist blamed the Herero for their own destruction:

“You had no reason to do this… Your entire nation has been destroyed… That is entirely your own fault.”

The performance was choreographed. The Herero were made to respond in unison to his questions:

“Do you admit that you started this war without reason and that you yourselves carry the blame for your misery?”
“Yes, we know it.”
“Do you trust that I will govern you justly and benignly from now on?”
“Yes, we trust you.”

This ritualized confession and submission was more than propaganda—it was the ideological cement of colonial rule: the public acceptance of guilt by the victims.

The Nama’s Betrayal and Deportation

Von Lindequist’s approach to the Nama resistance was similarly duplicitous. After receiving surrender from several Nama leaders in Gibeon, he promised food, safety, and negotiation. But once they were relocated to Windhoek, they were informed that they were being held under military surveillance. By February 1906, nearly 2,000 Nama, including women and children, were marched north into captivity without realizing they were heading to concentration camps.

Photographs show the forced march—women and elderly on foot, covering their faces from dust. At the Windhoek camp, they were housed separately from the Herero, surrounded by thorn-fences that could tear human flesh.

Von Lindequist’s arrival was again marked by a speech. He accused the Nama of committing “premeditated murder” and declared:

“You all deserve to be executed… That justice will not take its proper course in this instance is only due to the assumption that you were not aware of the extent of your actions.”

Even as most of the Nama prisoners were non-combatants—many elderly or female—their mere survival was framed as inherent guilt.

The Shark Island “Solution”

In 1906, complaints from white settlers in Windhoek about the proximity of Nama prisoners led von Lindequist to propose deporting them to Samoa. The idea was abandoned due to cost, and instead, the Nama were sent to Shark Island in Lüderitz harbour—a site already notorious for its death rates among Herero prisoners.

By this stage, the colony’s administration had internalized a Social Darwinist worldview. Anthropologist Leonard Schultze, conducting “research” on prisoners, argued that Africans unfit for labor should be allowed to disappear:

“We who build our houses on the graves of these races have a responsibility to safeguard civilisation, sparing no means.”

The Nama, seen as militarily dangerous and economically useless, were written off as a people destined for extinction.

Forced Labor and Civilian Expansion

While von Trotha had focused on destruction, Lindequist focused on economic utility. He ramped up forced labor in the camps—Herero were tasked with building railways, colonial homes, even a villa for the deputy governor. Meanwhile, Nama prisoners labored on public works under near-slavery conditions. The colony was being rebuilt quite literally on the bones and sweat of the defeated.

Von Lindequist, unlike von Trotha, understood optics. He deployed missionaries as tools to coax Herero and Nama out of hiding, promised leniency, then reneged. He created the illusion of reconciliation while embedding genocide into state infrastructure.

Key Takeaways

  1. Von Lindequist replaced overt genocide with rhetorical control, using confessions, rituals, and administrative force to solidify colonial rule.
  2. Herero and Nama survivors were blamed for their own suffering, in scripted ceremonies that symbolized submission and guilt.
  3. Deportation, deception, and duplicity defined policy: promises of safety masked a second phase of elimination by labor and neglect.
  4. Shark Island became the final destination for Nama prisoners, selected for death by irrelevance in colonial logic.
  5. Colonial anthropology supported extermination, arguing that unfit races should disappear for the sake of European civilisation.
  6. Forced labor became the economic engine of the post-genocide colony, transforming Namibia into a death-built society clothed in legal bureaucracy.

Chapter 12: The Island of Death

This chapter focuses on Shark Island, the most infamous concentration camp in German South-West Africa, and one of the deadliest in the history of colonialism. The authors document the conditions, administration, and systemic violence that turned this wind-blasted outpost into a deliberate site of extermination—especially for the Nama people, who had surrendered or been captured following the rebellion.

Shark Island: From Port Outpost to Death Camp

Located in Lüderitz harbour, Shark Island was initially developed as a military quarantine station. But in 1905, German authorities transformed it into a concentration camp. The island was small—about 1,300 yards long and just 300 yards wide—isolated and easily guarded. Its windswept and freezing environment made it one of the most inhospitable locations in the colony.

The camp housed both Herero (since 1904) and Nama prisoners (arriving from 1906 onward). Reports from missionaries and survivors consistently describe Shark Island as the most feared place in German South-West Africa.

Conditions of Total Neglect and Abuse

Prisoners lived in makeshift shelters made of rags, exposed to icy Atlantic winds and dense fog. Temperatures at night dropped close to freezing. Food consisted of uncooked rice, rotting horse meat, and flour, causing widespread malnutrition. Medical care was essentially nonexistent.

Missionary Laaf and others reported that death came rapidly, often from exhaustion, scurvy, or dysentery. People died daily in large numbers. By the end of 1906, mortality was so high that the average weekly death toll reached 50, with some days seeing up to 18 deaths.

The Work of Death

Labor was central to the camp’s operation. German engineer Richard Müller supervised a major project: the construction of a quay in Lüderitz harbour. Nama prisoners—including women—were forced to haul stones and stand for hours in freezing water. Survivors recalled men collapsing from cold and exhaustion. Only small children were exempt from work.

By late 1906, Müller reported that his labor force had shrunk from hundreds to just 30–40 individuals, most of them gravely ill. The project stalled because the camp was literally killing off its laborers faster than they could be used.

Medical Cruelty and Experiments

Prisoners feared the camp’s field hospital, run by Dr. Bofinger, where no one ever returned alive. Reports indicate that Bofinger conducted medical experiments—such as administering crystallized lemon juice to prisoners thought to be dying of scurvy—without understanding or seeking informed consent.

His methods caused terror among the Nama. Many refused to enter the field tent clinic and crawled back to their quarters to die unseen.

Systematic Obstruction of Rescue

Missionaries, including Brothers Laaf and Nyhof, and even military commanders like Colonel von Deimling, appealed to Berlin and Windhoek for the evacuation of Nama prisoners, especially women and children. These appeals were deliberately obstructed by Deputy Governor Oskar Hintrager, who argued that allowing the survivors to leave would “spread hate and mistrust” against German colonialism.

Even when a temporary relocation was approved for 230 women and children in February 1907, further removal was blocked. The official strategy was to delay evacuation while allowing the death toll to rise—a slow-motion genocide masked by bureaucratic inertia.

Closure of the Camp

The camp was finally closed in April 1907, not due to humanitarian concerns but because of the intervention of Major Ludwig von Estorff, who had opposed von Trotha’s extermination policies and happened to be visiting Lüderitz. Outraged by what he witnessed, he refused to let his troops be involved in what he called a “hangman’s duty” and ordered the camp’s closure.

On 8 April 1907, 573 survivors staggered across the causeway to the mainland. Many were too weak to walk. An estimated 123 were expected to die shortly after evacuation. Of the 2,400 Nama sent to Shark Island, only about 500 survived, and fewer than 10 percent of all Nama prisoners made it through the concentration camp system alive.

Key Takeaways

  1. Shark Island was the epicenter of German colonial extermination, especially against the Nama people.
  2. Living conditions were designed to kill: exposure, starvation, disease, and overwork were the norm, not exception.
  3. Death rates were astronomical: daily deaths, high-profile medical abuse, and labor exhaustion ensured the camp’s function as a death site.
  4. Medical experimentation occurred under Dr. Bofinger, who was feared as a figure of death, not healing.
  5. Efforts to rescue prisoners were deliberately blocked by the colonial administration, revealing genocidal intent at the highest levels.
  6. The camp’s closure in 1907 came only through military disobedience, not ethical awakening or policy reform.

Chapter 13: Our New Germany on African Soil

This chapter examines the transformation of German South-West Africa into a white settler colony, culminating in the 1912 Windhoek celebrations of Kaiser Wilhelm II’s birthday. It explores how genocide was not only whitewashed but mythologized, turning racial extermination into a patriotic colonial foundation myth.

A German Town on African Soil

On 27 January 1912, Windhoek was adorned in imperial colors and filled with settlers dressed in European finery. The day’s centerpiece was the unveiling of the Reiterdenkmal (Rider Monument), a 16-foot bronze statue glorifying the German colonial soldiers—with no reference to the Herero and Nama victims.

The city’s infrastructure—railroads, villas, gardens, and shops—had been built by Herero and Nama forced laborers who survived the camps. This physical transformation of the capital was presented as a triumph of civilization, while its genocidal roots were systematically erased.

Constructing Colonial Memory and Myth

The monument and the celebrations enshrined a narrative of heroism while burying genocide. Settlers added “von” to their surnames, performed German nobility, and began to construct a colonial bourgeois identity.

Colonial newspapers, clubs, and public discourse advanced a mythology: Germany had brought order to chaos, and any mention of mass killing was replaced by stories of military sacrifice and settler fortitude. The Herero and Nama were disappeared from the narrative.

A Racial Utopia in the Making

South-West Africa was increasingly imagined as a racial utopia—a place where a purer, stronger Germany could thrive. Influenced by Völkisch ideology, settlers envisioned the land as sacred, regenerated through German blood and labor.

This colony was not just an economic possession—it was a symbolic space for national rebirth. German settlers saw themselves as the builders of a new Germany, free from urban decay, social division, and racial impurity.

Pan-Germanism and Inner Colonization

At the same time, in Germany, the idea of “inner colonization” took hold: settling Germans in eastern territories to prevent Slavic or Polish influence. The Pan-German League advocated for racial consolidation at home and expansion abroad.

The ideology of Lebensraum (living space)—later adopted by the Nazis—had its roots in this colonial moment. German South-West Africa became a test site for demographic engineering and racial purification.

Colonial Education and Infrastructure

Germany institutionalized colonial ideology through colonial schools in Witzenhausen and a Colonial Institute in Hamburg, where students were trained in tropical medicine, ethnology, and colonial economics.

These institutions helped normalize scientific racism and imperial administration, creating a professional class committed to managing racial hierarchies and extracting wealth from conquered territories. Business interests, including Deutsche Bank, supported this project.

Diamonds and Settler Expansion

The discovery of diamonds in Lüderitz in 1908 brought a second wave of settlers. Former killing fields now yielded precious stones. Herero and Nama survivors, excluded from political life, were used as coerced labor in diamond extraction.

German South-West Africa had become a colonial economy built on extermination, exclusion, and forced labor, yet celebrated as a moral and national success.

Key Takeaways

  1. Windhoek’s transformation into a “German city” was built on forced labor and ethnic cleansing, then celebrated through monumental propaganda.
  2. The Rider Monument embodied colonial erasure, glorifying German soldiers while ignoring indigenous genocide.
  3. German settlers developed a new racial identity, blending imperial fantasy with völkisch ideology.
  4. Pan-Germanism linked colonialism abroad to racial control at home, especially through ideas of “inner colonization.”
  5. Germany institutionalized its colonial project through schools, research centers, and cultural networks, creating a pipeline for future expansion.
  6. The colony’s wealth, including diamonds, was built on land seized through extermination, making genocide profitable and foundational to the new order.
  7. The colonial experience helped shape the intellectual and administrative blueprint for later racial empire, especially in Nazi Germany’s visions of Eastern Europe.